Trees that wood

by Admin 5. June 2010 18:25

Once there were three trees on a hill in the woods. They were discussing their hopes and dreams when the first tree said, "Someday I hope to be a treasure chest. I could be filled with gold, silver and precious gems. I could be decorated with intricate carving and everyone would see the beauty."

Then the second tree said, "Someday I will be a mighty ship. I will take kings and queens across the waters and sail to the corners of the world. Everyone will feel safe in me because of the strength of my hull."

Finally the third tree said, "I want to grow to be the tallest and straightest tree in the forest. People will see me on top of the hill and look up to my branches, and think of the heavens and God and how close to them I am reaching. I will be the greatest tree of all time and people will always remember me."

After a few years of praying that their dreams would come true, a group of woodsmen came upon the trees. When one came to the first tree he said, "This looks like a strong tree, I think I should be able to sell the wood to a carpenter" ... and he began cutting it down. The tree was happy, because he knew that the carpenter would make him into a treasure chest.

At the second tree a woodsman said, "This looks like a strong tree, I should be able to sell it to the shipyard." The second tree was happy because he knew he was on his way to becoming a mighty ship.

When the woodsmen came upon the third tree, the tree was frightened because he knew that if they cut him down his dreams would not come true. One of the woodsmen said, "I don't need anything special from my tree so I'll take this one", and he cut it down.

When the first tree arrived at the carpenters, he was made into a feed box for animals. He was then placed in a barn and filled with hay. This was not at all what he had prayed for. The second tree was cut and made into a small fishing boat. His dreams of being a mighty ship and carrying kings had come to an end. The third tree was cut into large pieces and left alone in the dark. The years went by, and the trees forgot about their dreams.

Then one day, a man and woman came to the barn. She gave birth and they placed the baby in the hay in the feed box that was made from the first tree. The man wished that he could have made a crib for the baby, but this manger would have to do. The tree could feel the importance of this event and knew that it had held the greatest treasure of all time. Years later, a group of men got in the fishing boat made from the second tree. One of them was tired and went to sleep. While they were out on the water, a great storm arose and the tree didn't think it was strong enough to keep the men safe. The men woke the sleeping man, and he stood and said "Peace" and the storm stopped. At this time, the tree knew that it had carried the King of Kings in its boat.

Finally, someone came and got the third tree. It was carried through the streets as the people mocked the man who was carrying it. When they came to a stop, the man was nailed to the tree and raised in the air to die at the top of a hill. When Sunday came, the tree came to realize that it was strong enough to stand at the top of the hill and be as close to God as was possible, because Jesus had been crucified on it.

The moral of this story is that when things don't seem to be going your way, always know that God has a plan for you. If you place your trust in Him, He will give you great gifts. Each of the trees got what they wanted, just not in the way they had imagined. We don't always know what God's plans are for us. We just know that His ways are not our ways, but His ways are always best.

Tags: , , , ,

Mails

Chanting - The Only Worthy Thing

by Admin 5. June 2010 18:15

Please accept my humble obeisance. All glories to Srila Prabhupada and Gurudev.

The competitive spirit is so high these days that it keeps us immersed into whirlpools of anxiety. Even 40 to 50 years ago, life was much more peaceful. But today we find that starting from admitting child into kinder-garden school, there is so much of hassles. Getting into school/college or getting job in a good company, getting married to suitable life-partner, getting children, wealth etc are not the goals of this life. The human life should not be spoilt only for these purposes. Being born in this world, it is important to do our material duties in whatever ashram we are, but while rendering those duties we should not forget the ultimate goal of our life and our constitutional position as servant of all Supreme Lord Krishna. It is important to remember that as His servants we have to render our duties to the best of our ability and accept whatever He gives us.

There is a higher purpose behind our human existence and there is a really worthy thing to be achieved. As Prahlad Maharaj says in Srimad Bhagavatam 7.5.31, the ultimate goal of life is Vishnu and we don't realise this truth. I am reminded of HG Devakinandan prabhuji's statement in one of his class "One wife is enough, one child is enough, one material existence enough. One trouble is enough. This conclusion we have to come for any material endeavours. The irony is that we realize a bit of it and after the event we forget about the whole thing. Then devotional service eludes by a long way." Srila Prabhupada writes that all suffering will come to an end the moment the love for Krishna and devotional service increases and it is the only solution to all our miseries. Therefore Srimad Bhagavatam gives the only worthy thing to be done in our life instead of getting frustrated in our material life.

antah sarasy uru-balena pade griheeto
graahena yutha-patir ambuja-hasta aartah
aahedam aadi purushaakhila-loka-naatha
teertha-shravah shravana-mangala-naamadheya

"The leader of the elephants, whose leg was attacked in a river by a crocodile of superior strength, was much aggrieved. Taking a lotus flower in his trunk, he addressed the Lord, saying, "O original enjoyer, Lord of the universe! O deliverer, as famous as a place of pilgrimage! All are purified simply by hearing Your holy name, which is worthy to be chanted."

Gajendra even though it was an elephant it came to the right conclusion, but in spite of crocodile of material energy drowning us completely in the ocean of material existence, we always look for alternative arrangement other than Krishna. This is the difficulty. We don't put Krishna as the centre, but we proclaim ourselves as devotees of Krishna, but heart of hearts we know that we are praying to Krishna only as supplementary aid. Gajendra understood the power of the Holy name which he has chanted as King Indradyumna in the previous life and therefore was able to understand the value and worth of the Holy name. So he realized the potency of the Holy name and makes a wonderful conclusion that why he is taking shelter of the Lord in this trying circumstances. Due to this unflinching faith, Lord reciprocated very quickly. Let us see why the Lord responded to him very quickly whereas it is not the case for us.

  1. You are the original enjoyer - (Aadhi purusha). Gajendra was conscious of this fact.
  2. Since He is the original enjoyer then He should be the Lord of the Universe (Akhila loka naatha). Gajendra has accepted the Supremacy of the Lord and has the conviction the Lord is the first protector.
  3. Since He is the enjoyer and Lord of the Universe then He is naturally famous.(teertha shravah). Gajendra wants to be delivered from material existence and therefore wants to be purified of his material contamination.
  4. Since He is the Lord of the Universe, is famous as place of pilgrimage, naturally His holy names can purify everybody. (shravana mangala) - Gajendra had firm conviction by chanting the holy name and prayers to the Lord will purify his contaminated form of existence.
  5. Since the holy name will purify everybody then automatically it is worth chanting. Naama dheya - Gajendra concludes that under this dire circumstances, the only worthy thing to do is to chant the holy names of the Lord.

In spite of knowing so many things, still we are not convinced that Holy name is the one and only worthy thing in our life. This due to our rebellious mind and uncontrolled senses and desires. So the reciprocation is not so much for us. We can very clearly see the ocean of difference between Gajendra and us.

So the conclusion to this verse is very nice . For that we will try to do the following things to the best of our capacity and pray for His mercy.

  1. We don't have the luxury of 1000 celestial years like Gajendra. Let us not waste time frivolously.
  2. We have to develop the consciousness that the Lord is the original enjoyer and we have our quota allocated and be satisfied with it.
  3. In order to develop the consciousness we have to accept the supremacy of the Lord in all circumstances and seek His protection first. In order to know the Supremacy, we have to have knowledge about Him from the pages of Srimad Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam.
  4. We should develop at least a taste for deliverance from this mirage world of existence. We should try to convince our mind that there is an existence which is completely spiritual and eternal. This may happen by the mercy of Guru and Krishna. This realisation is difficult, but we should try in this process.
  5. Chanting the holy name will purify my existence . This is the daunting conviction we should cultivate everyday. This can be done if we do nityam bhagavata sevaya by hearing from great souls like Srila Prabhupada and Guru Maharaj
  6. Chanting is the beginning and final thing in Devotional service and it is the worthiest of all the things in Devotional service. Chanting is the most potent form of Devotional service and due to its being daily routine, it become monotonous. We should hit our rebellious mind that chanting is worthiest thing to do and that Lord alone can deliver us from material existence. So we should give top priority to chanting over other devotional service. We should not take it for granted and should especially chant with attention.
  7. Above all be conscious that we are in the jaws of material energy to be swallowed and this situation is more precarious than Gajendra's. Crocodile of material existence is really more powerful than crocodile which is holding the feet of Gajendra. (urubalna grhitah). So let us sincerely chant

Hare Krishna Hare Krishna Krishna Krishna Hare Hare
Hare Rama Hare Rama Rama Rama Hare Hare.

I sincerely pray for the causeless mercy of our beloved Gurudev, Srila Prabhupada that I should hammer my rebellious mind constantly to start accepting that Chanting is the only worthy in this life and nothing else.

Tags: , , ,

Granthraj

Life comes from Life - Part 8

by Admin 25. April 2010 15:42

The First Morning Walk

The Second Morning Walk

Nobel Prize for an Ass

DR. SINGH: Some scientists hope that in the future they will be able to make babies in test tubes.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Test tubes?

DR. SINGH: Yes, they intend to combine male and female elements in biological laboratories.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: If they begin with living entities, what is the purpose of the test tube? It is only a place for combination, but so is the womb. Where is the credit for the scientists if this is already being done in nature’s test tube?

KARANDHARA: It is already being done by nature, but when some scientist does it, people will give him the Nobel Prize.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Yes, that is stated in Srimad-Bhagavatam: sva-vid-varahostra-kharaih samstutah purusah pasuh. This verse indicates that those who praise men who are like animals are no better than dogs, hogs, camels and asses. Sva means “dog,” vid-varaha means “stool-eating hog,” ustra means “camel,” and khara means “ass.” If the Nobel Prize is given to a scientist show is a rascal, the men on the committee who give him that prize are no better than dogs, hogs, camels and asses. We don’t accept them as human beings. One animal is praised by another animal. Where is the credit in that? If the men on the committee are no better than animals, anyone who receives the Nobel Prize in science is fool number one, because animals are praising him, not human beings.

DR. SINGH: For some scientists, the Nobel Prize is the ultimate.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: They are rascals. They are speaking non-sense, and because they are juggling words, others are being misled.

BRAHMANANDA SVAMI: Nobel is the person who invented dynamite.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: He has created great misfortune, and he has left his money for creating further misfortune. [Laughter.]

BRAHMANANDA SVAMI: The Gita says that demoniac people perform acts meant to destroy the world.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Yes. Ugra-karmanah ksayaya jagato ‘hitah [Bg. 16.9]. They perform acts meant for inauspiciousness and the destruction of the world.

Tags: , , ,

Granthraj

Life comes from Life - Part 7

by Admin 3. April 2010 10:55

The First Morning Walk

The Second Morning Walk

The Missing Link

DR. SINGH: In fact, there are several theories explaining how life originated from matter, how living matter came from non-living.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: [casting Dr. Singh in the role of materialistic scientist]. All right, scientist, why is life not coming from matter now? You rascal. Why isn’t life coming from matter now?
                    Actually such scientists are rascals. They childishly say that life came from matter, although they are not at all able to prove it. Our Krsna consciousness movement should expose all these rascals. They are only bluffing. Why don’t they create life immediately? In the past, they say, life arose from matter; and they say that this will happen again in the future. They even say that they will create life from matter. What kind of theory is this? They have already commented that life began from matter. This refers to the past - “began.” Then why do they now speak of the future? Is it not contradictory? They are expecting the past to occur in the future. This is childish nonsense.

KARANDHARA: They say that life arose from matter in the past that they will create life this way in the future.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: What is this nonsense? If they cannot prove that life arises from matter in the present, how do they know life arose this way in the past?

DR. SINGH: They are assuming…

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Everyone can assume, but this is not science. Everyone can assume something. You can assume something, I can assume something. But there must be proof. We can prove that life arises from life. For example, a father begets a child. The father is living, and the child is living. But where is their proof that a father can be a dead stone? Where is their proof? We can easily prove that life begins from life. And the original life is Krsna. That also can be proven. But what evidence exists that a child is born of stone? They cannot actually prove that life comes from matter. They are leaving that aside for the future [Laughter.]

KARANDHARA: The scientists say that they can now formulate acids, amino acids, that are almost like one-celled living organisms. They say that because these acids are so closely resemble living beings, there must be just one missing link needed before they can create life.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Nonsense! Missing link. I’ll challenge them to their face! [Laughter.] They are missing this challenge. The missing link is this challenge to their face.

Tags: , , , ,

Granthraj

Life comes from Life - Part 6

by Admin 1. April 2010 03:55

The First Morning Walk

The Second Morning Walk

In the Future

KARANDHARA: They say they will create life in the future.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: What future? When this crucial point is raised, they reply, “We shall do it in the future.” Why in the future? That is nonsense. “Trust no future, however pleasant.” If they are so advanced, they must demonstrate now how life can be created from chemicals. Otherwise what is the meaning of their advancement? They are talking nonsense.

KARANDHARA: They say that they are right on the verge of creating life.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: That’s only a different way of saying the same thing: “In the future.” The scientists must admit that they will soon prove a chemical origin of life is something like paying someone with a postdated check. Suppose I give you a postdated check of ten thousand dollars but I actually have not money. What is the value of that check? Scientists are claiming that their science is wonderful, but when a practical example is wanted, they say they will provide it in the future. Suppose I say that I possess millions of dollars, and when you ask me for some money I say, “Yes, I will now give you a big postdated check. Is that allright?” If you are intelligent, you will reply, “At present give me atleast five dollars in cash so I can see something tangible.” Similarly, the scientists cannot produce even a single blade of grass in their laboratories, yet they are claiming that life is produced from chemicals. What is this nonsense? Is no one questioning this?

KARANDHARA: They say that life is produced by chemical laws.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: As soon as there is a law, we must take into consideration that someone made that law. Despite all their so-called advancement, the scientist in their laboratories cannot produce even a blade of grass. What kind of scientists are they?

DR. SINGH: They say that in the ultimate analysis, everything came from matter. Living matter came from nonliving matter.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Then where is this living matter coming from now? Do the scientists say that life came from matter in the past but does not at the present? Where is the ant coming from now – from the dirt?

Tags: , , ,

Granthraj

6 Truths of Life

by Admin 29. March 2010 13:38
  1. You cannot touch all of your top teeth with your tongue.
  2. All idiots, while reading the First Truth, will try to do it.
  3. And they will discover that the First Truth is a lie.
  4. You're smiling now because you're one of those idiots.
  5. You soon will forward this to another idiot.
  6. And there will still be a stupid smile on your face while you're doing it.

I do not apologize about this and I do not feel sorry about sending it to you.
I'm an idiot too and I just needed company!
Welcome to the club!!

Tags: , , , , ,

Mails

Life comes from Life - Part 5

by Admin 27. March 2010 14:50

The Second Morning Walk
Recorded on April 19, 1973,
in Cheviot Hills Park, Los Angeles.

Srila Prabhupada is accompained by Dr. Thoudam Damodara Singh, Karandhara dasa adhikari, Brahmananda Svami and other students.

Darwinism Extinct

SRILA PRABHUPADA: This material world is a composition of three qualities – sattva, rajas and tamas (goodness, passion and ignorance) – which are working everywhere. These three qualities are present in variour proportions in all species of life. For example, some trees produce nice fruits, while other are simply meant for fuel. This is due to the association of particular qualities of nature. Among animals also, these three qualities are present. The cow is in the quality of goodness, the lion in passion, and the monkey in ignorance. According to Darwin, Darwin’s father is a monkey. [Laughter.] He has theorized foolishly.

DR. SINGH: Darwin has said that some species become extinct in the struggle for survival. Those which are capable of surviving will survive, but those which are not will become extinct. So he says survival and extinction go side by side.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Nothing is extinct. The monkey is not extinct. Darwin’s immediate forefather, the monkey, is still existing.

KARANDHARA: Darwin said there must be a natural selection. But selection means choice. So who is choosing?

SRILA PRABHUPADA: That must be a person. Who is allowing someone to survive and someone to be killed? There must be some authority with discretion to give such an order. That is our first proposition. Who that authority is, is explained in  Bhagavad-gita, Krsna says, mayadhyaksena prakrtih: “Nature is working under My supervision.” [Bg. 9.10]

DR. SINGH: Darwin also says that the difference species were not created simultaneously, but evolved gradually.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Then what is his explanation for how the process of evolution began?

KARANDHARA: Modern proponents of Darwinism say that the first living organism was created chemically.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: And I say to them, “If life originated from chemicals, and if your science is so advanced, then why can’t you create life biochemically in your laboratories?”

 

The First Morning Walk

 

 

Tags: , , ,

Granthraj

Life comes from Life - (Part 4)

by Admin 2. March 2010 19:10

The First Morning Walk

The 8.6-Billion-Year Day

DR. SINGH: The problem with the world is that practically everyone is thinking only in terms of his own circumstances – and that is nonsense.

STUDENT: Someone who has never gone out of his village thinks that his village is the whole world.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Yes. The frog is always thinking in terms relative to his well. He has no power to think otherwise. The ocean is great, but he is thinking of the ocean’s greatness in terms relative to his own greatness. Similarly, God is great, but we thinking of God in terms of relative greatness, greatness relative to our own. There are certain insects that are born at night, and they grow, bear offspring and die – all before daybreak. They never see the morning. So if they conclude that there is no morning, that is nonsense. In the same way, as soon as we hear from sastras [revealed scriptures] that Brahma’s duration of life is equivalent to millions of our years, we do not believe it. We say, “How can it be?” But Bhagavad-gita [8.17] says sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmano viduh: “Four billion three hundred million earth years equal Brahma’s twelve hours.” Even a leading Indian politician who was known as a great scholar of the Gita could not accept this information. He said it is mental speculation. Such a rascal! Yet he is passing as an important scholar. This is the problem. Rascals and fools are passing as scholars, scientists and philosophers, and therefore the whole world is being misguided.

 

Tags: , , ,

Granthraj

Life comes from Life - (Part 3)

by Admin 26. February 2010 17:48

The First Morning Walk

Relativity and Knowledge

SRILA PRABHUPADA: All living entities possess the required intelligence to execute four principles: eating, sleeping, sexual intercourse and defence. These four principles exist even in the atom. The only difference in the human being is that he has extra intelligence with which to understand God. This is the difference. Ahara-nidra-bhaya-maithunam ca samanam etat pasubhir naranam. Eating, sleeping, sex life and defense are to be found everywhere. You have seen trees growing. Wherever there is a knot, the bark does not go this way; it goes that way. [Srila Prabhupada gestures to show that a tree’s bark grows not over a knot, but around it.] The tree has intelligence: “If I go this way, I will be blocked, so I will go that way.” But where are its eyes? How can it see? It has intelligence. That intelligence may not be as good as yours, but it is intelligence. Similarly, a child also has intelligence, though not as developed as his father’s. In due course of time, when the child gets a body like that of his father, the child’s intelligence will be fully developed and exhibited.

DR. SINGH: Then intelligence is relative.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Yes. Everything is relative. You have your body, your duration of life, and your intelligence, and the ant has his. Both we and the ant live for one hundred years, but the length of our hundred-year life-span is relative to our bodies. Even Brahma, the longest-living entity in this universe, lives for one hundred years. To us the ant’s life-span may seem only a few days. In the same way, on the other planets with atmospheres different from the earth’s , there are life-forms suited to those conditions. But the scientists try to view everything according to the relative conditions of planet earth. This is nonsense. Why are they doing that? If the whole cosmic manifestation follows the law of relativity, how can the scientist say that the conditions of this planet must apply to life on the other planets?

The Vedas instruct us that knowledge must always be considered in terms of desa-kala-patra. Desa means “circumstances,” kala means “time,” and patra means “the object.” We must understand everything by taking these three elements into consideration. For example, a fish is living very comfortably in the water, and we are shivering on the shore of the sea. This is because my desa-kala-patra and the fish’s desa-kala-patra are different. But if we conclude that the sea gulls will also shiver in the water, that is nonsense; their desa-kala-patra is again different. There are 8,400,000 different species of life in the material cosmic manifestation, and each species must adjust to circumstances differently. Even on this planet, you cannot go live comfortably in Alaska, although it is America. Similarly, the living entities enjoying life in Alaska do not come here.

KARANDHARA: Relatively, then, is based upon our individual situation.

SRILA PRABHUPADA: Yes. Therefore it is said that what is food for one is poison for another.

BRAHMANANDA SVAMI: Because scientists cannot survive on the moon, they think no one else can.

Tags: , , , ,

Granthraj

Speed Cooking Competitions

by Admin 17. February 2010 19:21

Tags: ,

Video